Some believe that International Terrorist cells are a form of weaponry as they attack civilian populations and this is not addressed adequately in the Geneva Convention, but many people believe it is one for of warfare. Indeed if it is used in war one could make that argument. But when it is used to politically motivate another nation to cave into a political action, then in that case it is purely International Terrorism.

We are not at War with Iran, yet they seem to think it is okay to sponsor International Terrorist groups and cells pre-positioned around the world. Many who side with this style of rhetoric do not see the Iranian President as a International Terrorist himself, but I do and just so every one understands on the other side of the debate hear me out;

You seem to be saying that the Iranian president is not a terrorist, you deny they are sending insurgents into Iraq. You I guess do not care they promised to blow Israel off the map and/or do not care that they are funding Hamas and Hezbollah? All this is somehow acceptable to you? Come on?

You see, The United States of America is indeed the greatest nation ever created in the history of mankind and we ought to be thankful to our leadership for carrying the torch and help and assist them where we can. Negative comments against the United State's steadfast resolve in countering International Terrorism is justified. Consider all this in 2006.

Lance Winslow

Currently Lance is retired at age 40 and is running an Online Think Tank Forum while traveling North America. Perhaps considering something extremely challenging to do that will exercise his mind and utilize all his experiences, observations and skills. Any ideas?